Appending large datasets: Magic ETL vs Redshift

Hi,
I have a need to append large datasets together with Domo, (Google analytics data in Big Query).
According to the documentation when you have inputs larger than 100m rows you should use Redshift to transform the data.
I compared doing large dataset appends in Magic ETL against Redshift and they both took a similar amount of time to complete. I was wondering what is the rationale behind the recommendation to use redshift when there doesn't seem to be an improvement in performance?
Thanks
Comments
-
Are you only appending these two datasets, or are you doing more calculations? If you only want to append them, you may want to consider using DataFusion since that's specifically designed for simple joins/appends on very large datasets.
0
Categories
- 7.6K All Categories
- Connect
- 913 Connectors
- 241 Workbench
- 470 Transform
- 1.8K Magic ETL
- 60 SQL DataFlows
- 445 Datasets
- 24 Visualize
- 194 Beast Mode
- 2K Charting
- 6 Variables
- 1 Automate
- 348 APIs & Domo Developer
- 82 Apps
- Workflows
- 14 Predict
- 3 Jupyter Workspaces
- 11 R & Python Tiles
- 241 Distribute
- 59 Domo Everywhere
- 241 Scheduled Reports
- 14 Manage
- 35 Governance & Security
- 18 Product Ideas
- 1.1K Ideas Exchange
- Community Forums
- 15 Getting Started
- 1 Community Member Introductions
- 49 Community News
- 18 Event Recordings
- 579 日本支部